Критика ісламськими вченими радикального салафізму

Грані 20 (8):31-36 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the twenty-first century Radical Salafism is a serious danger for Muslim countries and Western countries too due to some features of its religious ideas, which lead to extremist actions. Among the critics of radical Salafism there are both Western and Muslim scholars, but the arguments of the latter are not well-known in the West. The benefits of this study are systematization and analysis of prominent Muslim scholars’ criticism towards radical Salafism. The study analyzed ideas of such modern Muslim thinkers and researchers as Mohamed Said Ramadan Al-Bouti and Rawil Gaynetdin on radical Salafism. The research argued that the Muslim scholars criticize, first of all, the following four features of radical Salafism. The first of them is Salafi movement’s claim for existence of historical basis of their words about the special status of Salafism in Islam as the only defender of initial purity of Islam. The second one is radical Salafism’s criticism towards innovations in the religion and life of Muslims. The third feature is radical Salafism’s practice of takfir (accusation of unbelief). The fourth one is radical Salafists’ intolerance of people with other opinions on religion and life. The study showed that the Muslim scholars have thought that Salafism occurred much later than the Salaf era. Rawil Gainutdin believes this occurred in the tenth century, and Mohamed Said Ramadan Al-Bouti argues that it happened only in the nineteenth century. Moreover, Al-Bouti emphasizes that, firstly, the salafs assumed the possibility of certain innovations and, secondly, Salafism is one of the nineteenth century innovations. Also Rawil Gainutdin indicated that the Judge of the Judgment Day is the one person who can declare a takfir. Consequently, radical salafists’ practice of takfir is a violation of Islam law. The Muslim scholars point out that radical Salafism’s position is harmful to Muslim Ummah, because it leads to numerous conflicts. For example, Mohamed Said Ramadan Al-Bouti explains that radical salafists split Muslim community and cause tension among Muslims. He analyzed numerous facts of such a destructive action of radical Salafism towards religious, social and personal life of Muslims. Moreover, the article shows the destructive nature of Jihadist Salafism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Теоретичне підґрунтя радикального салафізму.Mykola Nesprava - 2017 - Українське Релігієзнавство 83 (5):148-157.
Egyptian Salafism in Revolution.Jacob Høigilt & Frida Nome - 2014 - Journal of Islamic Studies 25 (1):33-54.
Types of Religious Identities within Romanian Muslim Communities.Alina Isac Alak - 2015 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 14 (41):148-173.
Evolution of Islamic Radicalism during the 19th to 21st Centuries.Konstantin Kachan - 2018 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 17 (49):105-119.
Salafism in Azerbaijan.Giorgi Omsarashvili - 2018 - Philosophy Study 8 (1).
Apologetic modernity.Faisal Devji - 2007 - Modern Intellectual History 4 (1):61-76.
«Образ ісламу в середньовічній Європі: релігієзнавчий аспект».Mykola Nesprava - 2017 - Філософія І Політологія В Контексті Сучасної Культури 5 (5):18-25.
Constructing the Space of Testimony.Nicholas Tampio - 2011 - Political Theory 39 (5):600-629.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-24

Downloads
276 (#72,501)

6 months
62 (#75,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Сутність і культурні кореляти мислення: Теоретичний аспект.Л. Г Комаха - 2015 - Гуманітарний Вісник Запорізької Державної Інженерної Академії 73:114-123.

Add more references