Game theory and conventiont

Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):3-19 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper rebuts criticisms by Hintikka of the author's account of game-theoretic semantics for classical logic. At issue are (i) the role of the axiom of choice in proving the equivalence of the game-theoretic account with the standard truth-theoretic account; (ii) the alleged need for quantification over strategies when providing a game-theoretic semantics; and (iii) the role of Tarski's Convention T. As a result of the ideas marshalled in response to Hintikka, the author puts forward a new conjecture concerning the relationship among truth, meaning and translation



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

39 (#296,295)

6 months
2 (#275,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neil Tennant
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references