State Facilitated Economic Abuse: A Structural Analysis of Men Deliberately Withholding Child Support
Feminist Legal Studies 26 (2):121-140 (2018)
AbstractEconomic abuse is well established as a widespread and damaging element of intimate partner violence. However research largely addresses cohabiting couples, with few detailed explorations of women’s longer-term experiences after separation. Further, researchers have not developed a gendered analysis of child support related economic abuse. Such an analysis requires understanding gender as a framework that organises institutions and relationships in ways that build and reproduce hierarchical relations of difference. In this paper, I present data from in-depth interviews with 37 single mothers to pursue a structural analysis of how men’s deliberate withholding of child support can be a form of economic abuse that is facilitated through gendered state processes and institutions that order child support transfers. I argue that masculine financial discretion structures policy and organizational practices in ways that legitimate men’s financial agency at the expense of women’s financial autonomy. On-going compliance issues are not the result of a failure of Australia’s Child Support Program, but suggest that the state’s role can be one of regulation, not prevention, of economic abuse. Thus, Australia’s Child Support Program normalises the potential for post-separation economic abuse.
Similar books and articles
Physical violence, child abuse, and child homicide.Richard J. Gelles - 1991 - Human Nature 2 (1):59-72.
Child abuse: Is there a mandate for researchers to report?Marisha B. Liss - 1994 - Ethics and Behavior 4 (2):133 – 146.
The favoured child?D. Jones, D. Dickenson & J. Devereux - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (2):108-111.
Child Abuse, Family Rights, and the Child Protective System: A Critical Analysis From Law, Ethics, and Catholic Social Teaching.Stephen M. Krason (ed.) - 2013 - Scarecrow Press.
Withholding and pursuit in the development of skills in interaction and language.Anna Filipi - 2013 - Interaction Studies 14 (2):139-159.
Child Maintenance: Several Topical Theoretical and Practical Aspects.Inga Kudinavičiūtė-Michailovienė & Jolanta Vėgelienė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (1):209-229.
Ethics and the forensic expert: A case study of child custody involving allegations of child sexual abuse.Kathryn Kuehnle - 1998 - Ethics and Behavior 8 (1):1 – 18.
Robotic Rape and Robotic Child Sexual Abuse: Should They be Criminalised?John Danaher - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):71-95.
Reasonable Suspicion of Child Abuse: Finding a Common Language.Benjamin H. Levi & Sharon G. Portwood - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (1):62-69.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Custody and Care of Children in Spain: Can the Two Rights be Reconciled?Marcela Jabbaz Churba - 2021 - Feminist Legal Studies 29 (3):351-373.
References found in this work
Gender As a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism.Barbara J. Risman - 2004 - Gender and Society 18 (4):429-450.
Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.Shelley J. Correll & Cecilia L. Ridgeway - 2004 - Gender and Society 18 (4):510-531.
Doing the Best I Can: Fatherhood in the Inner City.[author unknown] - 2013
Custody Stalking: A Mechanism of Coercively Controlling Mothers Following Separation.Vivienne Elizabeth - 2017 - Feminist Legal Studies 25 (2):185-201.