Elucidating limited shareholder engagement: identifying ethical and epistemological factors in the fiduciary

Centre for Business Research, Judge Business School, Cambridge University (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The legal concept of fiduciary, from the Latin fīdūcia meaning trust, plays a fundamental role in all financial and business organisations: it acts as a moral safeguard of the relationship between trustee and beneficiary, ensuring that the beneficiaries' best interests are met. It is often referred to as a duty of care. This paper focuses on the ethics of the fiduciary, but from a unique and historical perspective, going back to the original formulation of the fiduciary within a familial context, to reveal not only why care plays a central role in the fiduciary, but to also uncover key foundational presuppositions regarding agential capabilities embedded in the trustee-beneficiary relationship. In doing so, the paper uncovers ethical issues of an epistemological kind at the core of the fiduciary. By using Miranda Fricker's theory of pre-emptive testimonial injustice, the analysis helps shed light on shareholder activism and explains limited engagement to date.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theorising the Fiduciary: Ontology and Ethics.Helen J. Mussell - 2023 - Journal of Business Ethics 186 (2):293-307.
Reclaiming the relational ontology of the fiduciary and exploring relational ethics.Helen Mussell - 2021 - Centre for Business Research (CBR), Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
Socially Responsible Investing: Is Your Fiduciary Duty at Risk?William Martin - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (4):549-560.
Exploring epistemic vices in the fiduciary: injustice and beyond.Helen Mussell - 2021 - Centre for Business Research (CBR), Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
Trust and Fiduciary Law.Matthew Harding - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (1):81-102.
Fiduciary Duties and Moral Blackmail.Simon Keller - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2).
Fiduciary Duties and Moral Blackmail.Simon Keller - 2018 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (3):481-495.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Helen Mussell
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references