People We Hire as Executioners: Who Are They? Who Are We?

Criminal Justice Ethics 35 (2):87-99 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Christopher Bennett has introduced a new inquiry into the capital punishment debate by looking at whether the role of executioner is one in which it is possible and proper to take pride. He argues...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Considering Capital Punishment as a Human Interaction.Christopher Bennett - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):367-382.
Reply to Bennett.Jeffrie G. Murphy - 2017 - Criminal Justice Ethics 36 (1):117-119.
Considering Murphy on Human Executioners.Christopher Bennett - 2017 - Criminal Justice Ethics 36 (1):111-116.
Learning From Forgiveness.Samuel H. Pillsbury - 2009 - Criminal Justice Ethics 28 (1):135-161.
Desert of What? On Murphy’s Reluctant Retributivism.Linda Radzik - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):161-173.
Review essay / justice, mercy, and forgiveness.R. A. Duff - 1990 - Criminal Justice Ethics 9 (2):51-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-13

Downloads
28 (#557,911)

6 months
15 (#233,546)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrie Murphy
PhD: University of Rochester; Last affiliation: Arizona State University

Citations of this work

Considering Murphy on Human Executioners.Christopher Bennett - 2017 - Criminal Justice Ethics 36 (1):111-116.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Considering Capital Punishment as a Human Interaction.Christopher Bennett - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):367-382.

Add more references