Jus Post Bellum and Political Reconciliation

In Larry May & Elizabeth Edenberg (eds.), Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The category of jus post bellum is a welcome addition to discussions of the justice of war. But, despite its handy Latin label, we will argue that it cannot be properly understood merely as a set of corollaries from jus ad bellum and jus in bello. Instead, an acceptable theory of justice in the postwar period will have to draw on a broader set of normative ideas than those that have been the focus of the just war tradition. In this paper, we will argue that norms of political reconciliation provide some of the resources we need to address postwar justice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The contingent morality of war: establishing a diachronic model of jus ad bellum.Marcus Schulzke - 2015 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (3):264-284.
Assembling an army: considerations for just war theory.Nathan P. Stout - 2016 - Journal of Global Ethics 12 (2):204-221.
Sexual Violence in Conflict Situations as Structural Injustice.Sally J. Scholz - 2022 - Washington University Review of Philosophy 2:43-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
42 (#390,004)

6 months
11 (#272,549)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Linda Radzik
Texas A&M University
Colleen Murphy
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references