In Larry May & Elizabeth Edenberg (eds.), Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2013)
AbstractThe category of jus post bellum is a welcome addition to discussions of the justice of war. But, despite its handy Latin label, we will argue that it cannot be properly understood merely as a set of corollaries from jus ad bellum and jus in bello. Instead, an acceptable theory of justice in the postwar period will have to draw on a broader set of normative ideas than those that have been the focus of the just war tradition. In this paper, we will argue that norms of political reconciliation provide some of the resources we need to address postwar justice.
Similar books and articles
Review of Colleen Murphy, A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation. [REVIEW]Kendy M. Hess - 2011 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (4).
Political Reconciliation, the Rule of Law, and Genocide.Colleen Murphy - 2007 - The European Legacy 12 (7):853-865.
Moral Compromise, Civic Friendship, and Political Reconciliation.Simon Căbulea May - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):581-602.
Taking Wrongs Seriously: Acknowledgement, Reconciliation, and the Politics of Sustainable Peace.Trudy Govier - 2006 - Humanity Books.
Community, conflict, and reconciliation.James Campbell - 2005 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 19 (4):187-200.
Mourning and Forgiveness as Sites of Reconciliation Pedagogies.Michalinos Zembylas - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):257-265.
The current state of political theory : Pluralism and reconciliation.J. Donald Moon - 2003 - In Stephen K. White & J. Donald Moon (eds.), What is Political Theory? Sage Publications.
Reply to Griswold, Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. [REVIEW]Michele Moody-Adams - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (3):429-437.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads