On a Misunderstood Art

Critical Inquiry 48 (3):483-498 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At the time of its publication in Cahiers du Cinéma in 1959, this text by Michel Mourlet constituted a manifesto for the Mac-Mahonists, a group of cinephiles named after the Paris movie theater, the Mac-Mahon, where they would gather, program, and watch films. This short but foundational essay stands as a vibrant defense of the near-ecstatic power of the movies, which Mourlet argues comes from the gaze of the camera and its ability to capture reality directly. For Mourlet, art must be sublime or it is of no interest; it must be intimate and passionate or it is trivial. Great movies set viewers “reeling in a vertigo,” precipitate them into a hypnotic state in which they lose themselves in a transformative experience from which they emerge whole. Praising absorption and fascination, Mourlet decries Brechtian distancing and any distortion of reality for expressive purposes. What makes filmmakers great, he writes in this text, is “the way in which their means of approaching the fundamental themes of the mise-en-scène, organized around the bodily presence of actors in a setting, is or is not capable of fascinating us.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Misunderstanding Epicurus? A Nietzschean Identification.Wilson H. Shearin - 2014 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 45 (1):68-83.
Russell and Bradley: Rehabilitating the Creation Narrative of Analytic Philosophy.Samuel Lebens - 2017 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 5 (7).
Vague Identity: Evans Misrepresented.J. A. Burgess - 1989 - Analysis 49 (3):112 - 119.
Strasser on dependence, reliance, and need.Michael Davis - 1986 - Philosophical Quarterly 36 (144):384-391.
What Has J. L. Austin to Do with Confucius?Hui-Chieh Loy - 2002 - International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):193-208.
Think, Again: A Reply to Ulrich Plass.Gerhard Richter - 2009 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2009 (148):170-172.
A Misunderstood Passage in Martial.H. J. Rose - 1924 - The Classical Review 38 (3-4):64-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
19 (#800,531)

6 months
10 (#269,579)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references