A Methodological Framework for Comparative Engagement
Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 8:187-200 (2008)
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to present and explain a meta-philosophical methodological framework of how to look at seemingly competing approaches for the sake of cross-tradition understanding and constructive engagement in comparative philosophy in a global context. For this purpose, first, I introduce and explain some relevant conceptual and explanatory resources employed in the framework, especially the distinction between the methodological perspective and the methodological guiding principle, and make some initial methodological points. Second, I suggest six meta-philosophical adequacy conditions for adequate methodological guiding principles, which constitute one core portion of the suggested methodological frameworkAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Differing ways, Dao and Weg: Comparative, metaphysical, and methodological considerations in Heidegger’s “Aus einem Gespräch von der Sprache”. [REVIEW]Bradley Douglas Park - 2004 - Continental Philosophy Review 37 (3):309-339.
Three Orientation and Four 'Sins' in Comparative Studies.Bo Mou - 2002 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:141-147.
History and philosophy of science rapprochement: Shared methodological framework.Dominika A. Yaneva - 1995 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (1):143 - 152.
The critique of equilibrium theory in economic methodology: A constructive empiricist perspective.Thomas A. Boylan & Pascal F. O'Gorman - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (2):131 – 142.
Are methodological rules hypothetical imperatives?David B. Resnik - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (3):498-507.
A Pragmatist Spin on Analytical Marxism and Methodological Individualism.Chandra Kumar - 2008 - Philosophical Papers 37 (2):185-211.
A reexamination of the structure and content of confucius' version of the golden rule.Bo Mou - 2004 - Philosophy East and West 54 (2):218-248.
Reclaiming Davidson’s Methodological Rationalism as Galilean Idealization in Psychology.Carole J. Lee - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (1):84-106.
What Do Mathematicians Want? Probabilistic Proofs and the Epistemic Goals of Mathematicians.Don Fallis - 2002 - Logique Et Analyse 45.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-04-04
Downloads
19 (#589,525)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
2013-04-04
Downloads
19 (#589,525)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
Historical graph of downloads