- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What Genes Can’t Do
Journal of the History of Biology 38 (2):383-384 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Lenny Moss: What Genes Can’t Do. [REVIEW]Alan C. Love - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (2):247-250.
Genes and Genomes: Genes, Genes and More Genes in the Human Major Histocompatibility Complex.Caroline M. Milner & R. Duncan Campbell - 1992 - Bioessays 14 (8):565-571.
What is a Gene? From molecules to metaphysics.Holmes Rolston - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):471-497.
The question of questions: What is a Gene? Comments on Rolston and Griffths & Stotz. [REVIEW]Lenny Moss - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):523-534.
Review of Lenny Moss, What Genes Can't Do. [REVIEW]Jonathan Michael Kaplan - 2003 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (8).
Book Reviews Lenny Moss, What Genes Can’t Do, Series on Basic Bioethics, no. 6 , xx + 228 pp., illus., $34.95, $20.00 paper. [REVIEW]Doris T. Zallen - 2005 - Journal of the History of Biology 38 (2):383-384.
Book review: Lenny Moss (2003). What genes can't do. [REVIEW]Pieter Lemmens - 2003 - Acta Biotheoretica 51 (2):141-150.
Lenny Moss, What Genes Can't Do. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003. [REVIEW]Karola C. Stotz - 2003 - Metascience 12 (3):414-417.
Moss, Lenny. What genes can't do.Pascal Borry - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):75-77.
Genes can disconnect the social brain in more than one way.André Aleman & René S. Kahn - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):855-855.
Should Human Genes Be Patented?David K. Chan - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):30-36.
The regulation of the yolk protein genes, a family of sex differentiation genes in Drosophila melanogaster.Mary Bownes - 1994 - Bioessays 16 (10):745-752.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-22
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2017-02-22
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Ontic Account of Scientific Explanation.Carl F. Craver - 2014 - In Marie I. Kaiser, Oliver R. Scholz, Daniel Plenge & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.), Explanation in the Special Sciences: The Case of Biology and History. Springer Verlag. pp. 27-52.
When Traditional Essentialism Fails: Biological Natural Kinds.Robert A. Wilson, Matthew J. Barker & Ingo Brigandt - 2007 - Philosophical Topics 35 (1-2):189-215.
The Epistemic Goal of a Concept: Accounting for the Rationality of Semantic Change and Variation.Ingo Brigandt - 2010 - Synthese 177 (1):19-40.
Scientific Pluralism.Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino & C. Kenneth Waters (eds.) - 1956 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
Fundamental issues in systems biology.Maureen A. O'Malley & John Dupré - 2005 - Bioessays 27 (12):1270-1276.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-zf4z4 uwo