Inner speech is not so simple: a commentary on Cho & Wu

Abstract

We welcome Cho and Wu’s suggestion that the study of auditory verbal hallucinations could be improved by contrasting and testing more explanatory models. However, we have some worries both about their criticisms of inner speech-based self-monitoring models and whether their proposed spontaneous activation model is explanatory

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Inner Speech, Imagined Speech, and Auditory Verbal Hallucinations.Daniel Gregory - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (3):653-673.
Inner speech as a forward model?Gary M. Oppenheim - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):369-370.
Oppressive speech.Mary Kate McGowan - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):389 – 407.
Epictetus on Speech: The Argument.Raymond Joseph Heisler - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Listening to speech in the dark.Robert E. Remez - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):281-282.
Silencing speech.Ishani Maitra - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):pp. 309-338.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-31

Downloads
54 (#295,023)

6 months
4 (#783,478)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?