Imperial Silences: How Hamlet's Editors Impede Criticism, Repeat Tradition and Defend Interpretative Empires

Colloquy 2 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

All people edit. We don't call it editing, of course. We call it thinking. Frogs think too. When a frog thinks'food', it looks for a moving dot; in a cage of dead flies, a frog starves to death. When something doesnot fit the category, it is not seen. Humans likewise. "Do you see nothing there?" Hamlet asks; "Nothingat all; yet all that is I see", Gertrude replies, exemplifying our difficulty with seeingthings not valued.[1] The reason for such editing is mental economy; given physiological computationallimits, operating with a limited set of categories and properties avoids cognitive paralysis

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Morgan
University of Newcastle, Australia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references