Does functional reduction need bridge laws? A response to Marras

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):647-657 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In his recent article ‘Consciousness and Reduction’, Ausonio Marras argues that functional reduction must appeal to bridge laws and thus does not represent a genuine alternative to Nagelian reduction. In response, I first argue that even if functional reduction must use bridge laws, it still represents a genuine alternative to Nagelian reduction. Further, I argue that Marras does not succeed in showing that functional reduction must use bridge laws. Introduction Nagelian Reduction, Functional Reduction, and Bridge Laws Marras on Functional Reduction The Logical Space of ‘Bridge Law’ Views of Reduction [RP] as an Account of Realization Conclusion CiteULike Connotea What's this?



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Identity-Based Reduction and Reductive Explanation.Raphael van Riel - 2010 - Philosophia Naturalis 47 (1-2):183-219.
Consciousness and reduction.Ausonio Marras - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):335-361.
Is functional reduction logical reduction?Max Kistler - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (14):219-234.
Theory Reduction by Means of Functional Sub‐types.Michael Esfeld & Christian Sachse - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (1):1 – 17.
Construction by reduction.Jeffry L. Ramsey - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (1):1-20.
Nagelian Reduction Beyond the Nagel Model.Raphael van Riel - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (3):353-375.


Added to PP

108 (#116,872)

6 months
3 (#226,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin Morris
Tulane University