Teaching students out of harm’s way

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 16 (3):290-302 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how changes in K-12 educational delivery methods in the USA impacts students as 1:1 device programs become a required tool for learning. This change produces gaps in knowledge and understanding of the digital environment and exposes minors to risk. Mandatory technology integration by school districts places the ethical responsibility on school districts to prepare students to use the digital environment to mitigate risk. Design/methodology/approach The author’s literature review focused on the impact of personal device integration in education on students. The author surveyed teachers in the district on what they perceived as risk to students accessing the digital environment and what they believe creates value in digital citizenship instructional content. The author also gathered information while serving on the school district technology steering committee and digital citizenship working group. Findings Mandatory 1:1 device programs used for learning provide unlimited access to the digital environment. This technology integration creates digital knowledge gaps in understanding among students and exposes them to risk or dangers such as loss of privacy, psychological harms and engaging in or being a victim of illegal online activities. School districts are responsible for providing a remedy to close this gap and mitigate risk by developing learning content resources for teachers. Social implications As 1:1 device programs continue to grow in school districts in the USA, it is essential for students to learn to apply protocols and understand norms of the digital world. Providing a digital citizenship curriculum in a format such as a Google Site will offer educators access to instructional content that teaches students to apply protocols, understand norms of the internet and social media and foster critical thinking to analyze power structures, biases and recognize manipulation online. Student must learn how to apply rules that challenge assumptions behind the digital content they see, and they must be able to identify and resolve digital practices and behaviors that are problematic, so they are prepared to participate in a digital society. Originality/value This perspective may be relevant to school districts contemplating personal device integration, providing insight into how 1:1 device use impacts students and develops an ethical position for creating digital citizenship resources for teachers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Teaching Mill's On Liberty.Emrys Westacott - 1997 - Teaching Philosophy 20 (3):301-310.
The media ethics classroom and learning to minimize harm.Sharon Logsdon Yoder & Glen L. Bleske - 1997 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 12 (4):227 – 242.
The teaching of medical ethics to medical students.S. M. Glick - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (4):239-243.
Cheating 101.Joel Marks - 2003 - Teaching Philosophy 26 (2):131-145.
Teaching Graduate Students to Teach.Steven M. Cahn - 2004 - Teaching Philosophy 27 (4):321-323.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-26

Downloads
22 (#706,230)

6 months
8 (#353,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references