The Philosophical Reception of Japanese Buddhism After 1868

In Gereon Kopf (ed.), The Dao Companion to Japanese Buddhist Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 155-204 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the writings of the Japanese Pure Land Buddhist Shinran 親鸞 (1173–1263) we read: “I, Shinran, do not have a single disciple of my own” (SZ Supplement: 10; Saitō 2010: 242; Yuien 1996: 6). Is he simply being modest? Does Shinran defy discipleship? Does he rule out the possibility of the reception of his thought? The answer to these questions is not clear; nevertheless, what we do know is that the reader of his writings is supposed to arrive at the Buddha’s original teaching. Shinran’s voluminous works, however, exhibit more than an introduction to, or simple interpretation of, the Buddha’s preaching. We may say that Shinran has given us sermons and treatises that manifest an authentic and unique appropriation of the Buddhist tradition, and, therefore, his works offer the possibility of a thoughtful reception for his interpreters and disciples. The philosopher KUKI Shūzō 九鬼周造 (1888–1941) wrote remarkable verses about Shinran seven centuries after his death: “I will have no disciple, said Shinran; as for me [Kuki], I long to have his soul” (KSZ Supplement, 146; Saitō 2010: 242). Kuki’s poetic reflections express Shinran’s quest for an authentic life, and echo back the existentialist aspect of his philosophy. More than this, his words commit him to Shinran as his teacher. Do these words not enact the most authentic discipleship possible? In fact, SAITŌ Takako takes Kuki’s verses as empirical evidence of his receiving the intellectual legacy of Shinran. Thus, at the end of her article, the proof of historical facticity of reception retroactively justifies Saitō’s careful comparison of Kuki’s thought with Shinran’s, which began based on presuming similarities in content. In other words, the factual findings prove the validity of comparing Shinran and Kuki, although a truthful reading is impossible to verify historically. Be that as it may, Kuki’s poetic expression demonstrates the history of the reception of a pre-modern Buddhist by a modern philosopher in Japan, regardless of whether this discipleship was ultimately judged to be authentic and perfected, or an untimely failure.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Search of the Absolute: Kuki Shūzō and Shinran.Takako Saitō - 2010 - In James W. Heisig & Rein Raud (eds.), Frontiers of Japanese Philosophy: Japanese Philosophy Abroad. Nanzan Institute for Religion & Culture. pp. 232-€“246.
Reading Nishida through Shinran.Elizabeth McManaman Grosz - 2016 - Journal of Buddhist Philosophy 2:172-186.
Young Man Shinran: A Reappraisal of Shinran's Life.John Yokota - 1990 - Buddhist-Christian Studies 10:285.
Self Power, Other Power, and Non-dualism in Japanese Buddhism.Steve Bein - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 6:7-13.
Human insufficiency in shinran and Kierkegaard.Joel R. Smith - 1996 - Asian Philosophy 6 (2):117 – 127.
Shin Buddhism. [REVIEW]J. H. P. - 1970 - Review of Metaphysics 24 (2):347-347.
Young Man Shinran: A Reappraisal of Shinran's Life.Shigeo H. Kanda - 1989 - Philosophy East and West 39 (3):359-361.
Kuki Shūzō and the Question of Hermeneutics.Ryōsuke Ōhashi - 2009 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 1 (1):23-37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-13

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Ralf Müller
Universität Hildesheim
Ralf Müller
Universität Hildesheim

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references