Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion

In (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,705

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Editorial: Risks of general artificial intelligence.Vincent C. Müller - 2014 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 26 (3):297-301.
Gender Equality and Artificial Intelligence.Bobi Badarevski - 2023 - Годишен зборник на Филозофскиот факултет/The Annual of the Faculty of Philosophy in Skopje 76 (1):805-815.
Douglas Walton, appeal to expert opinion– arguments from authority.Ronald Leenes - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):277-281.
Risks of artificial general intelligence.Vincent C. Müller (ed.) - 2014 - Taylor & Francis (JETAI).
Future Imaginings in Art and Artificial Intelligence.Andreia Machado Oliveira - 2023 - Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology 9 (2):209-225.
When expert opinion evidence goes wrong.Douglas Walton - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 27 (4):369-401.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-12

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Vincent C. Müller
Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Nick Bostrom
Oxford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references