Economics and Philosophy 18 (2):235-257 (2002)

Uskali Mäki
University of Helsinki
In a series of insightful publications, Philip Pettit and Frank Jackson have argued for an explanatory ecumenism that is designed to justify a variety of types of social scientific explanation of different , including structural and rational choice explanations. Their arguments are put in terms of different kinds of explanatory information; the distinction between causal efficacy, causal relevance and explanatory relevance within their program model of explanation; and virtual reality and resilience explanation. The arguments are here assessed from the point of view of the illumination they are able to cast on the issue of economics imperialism, the project of privileging rational choice as a unifying basis for explanations. While the Jackson–Pettit arguments turn out to be helpful in specifying some of the ontological and pragmatic constraints on economics imperialism, they are also shown to conflate distinct dimensions in the purported explanantia (such as small grain and particular grain, and the macro and the existentially quantified) and thereby to miss an important class of individualist causal process explanations of social phenomena
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0266267102002031
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is a Law of Nature?D. Armstrong - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.
Explanation and Scientific Understanding.Michael Friedman - 1974 - Journal of Philosophy 71 (1):5-19.
Causality and Explanation.Wesley C. Salmon - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Explanatory Unification.Philip Kitcher - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (4):507-531.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Economics Imperialism: Concept and Constraints.Uskali Mäki - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3):351-380.
Scientific Imperialism: Difficulties in Definition, Identification, and Assessment.Uskali Mäki - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):325-339.
Notes on Economics Imperialism and Norms of Scientific Inquiry.Uskali Mäki - 2021 - Revue de Philosophie Économique 1:95-127.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Indispensability Arguments in Favour of Reductive Explanations.Jeroen Van Bouwel, Erik Weber & Leen De Vreese - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1):33-46.
Explanatory Depth.Brad Weslake - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (2):273-294.
Deflationism and the Success Argument.By Nic Damnjanovic - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):53–67.


Added to PP index

Total views
116 ( #103,486 of 2,533,755 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #259,908 of 2,533,755 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes