Magnitude, moment, and measurement: The seismic mechanism controversy and its resolution

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 65:112-120 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the history of two related problems concerning earthquakes, and the way in which a theoretical advance was involved in their resolution. The first problem is the development of a physical, as opposed to empirical, scale for measuring the size of earthquakes. The second problem is that of understanding what happens at the source of an earthquake. There was a controversy about what the proper model for the seismic source mechanism is, which was finally resolved through advances in the theory of elastic dislocations. These two problems are linked, because the development of a physically based magnitude scale requires an understanding of what goes on at the seismic source. I will show how the theoretical advances allowed seismologists to re-frame the questions they were trying to answer, so that the data they gathered could be brought to bear on the problem of seismic sources in new ways.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Experimental Tests of Isometry Hypotheses.Roberto de Andrade Martins - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (3):296 - 304.
Universals and Measurement.Stephen Boydstun - 2004 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 5 (2):271 - 305.
Universals And Measurement.Stephen Boydstun - 2004 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 5 (10):271-304.
Underdetermination, Black Boxes, and Measurement.Teru Miyake - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):697-708.
Measurement of sensory intensity.Richard M. Warren - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (2):175-189.
Medical Fact and Ulcer Disease: A Study in Scientific Controversy Resolution.Mark Cherry - 2002 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24 (2):249 - 273.
Proof of a retroactive influence.C. W. Rietdijk - 1978 - Foundations of Physics 8 (7-8):615-628.
The Dimensions of Scientific Controversy: The Biometric—Mendelian Debate.Robert Olby - 1989 - British Journal for the History of Science 22 (3):299-320.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-02

Downloads
27 (#587,064)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Teru Miyake
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Citations of this work

Pluralizing measurement: Physical geodesy's measurement problem and its resolution.Miguel Ohnesorge - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 96 (C):51-67.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references