The missing-explanation argument revisited

Analysis 61 (1):76-86 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/61.1.76

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Functionalist response-dependence avoids missing explanations.D. J. Bradley - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):297-300.
Mark Johnston’s Substitution Principle: A New Counterexample?Duncan Mcfarland - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):683-689.
Why the New Missing Explanation Argument Fails, Too.Jussi Haukioja - 2006 - Erkenntnis 64 (2):169-175.
Explanation and the Cosmological Argument.Bruce Reichenbach - 2004 - In Michael Peterson & Raymond vanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. London: Blackwell. pp. 97-114.
More responses to the missing-explanation argument.Alexander Miller - 1997 - Philosophia 25 (1-4):331-349.
The missing link revisited: The role of teleology in representing legal argument. [REVIEW]T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):79-94.
Argument and explanation in mathematics.Michel Dufour - 2013 - In Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewiński (ed.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013. pp. pp. 1-14..
How to refute principles of sufficient reason.John F. Post - 1999
Merely possible explanation.Ghislain Guigon - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):359-370.
The overdetermination argument revisited.Agustín Vicente - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (3):331-47.
Foundational Grounding and the Argument from Contingency.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 8.
A response to Almeida and Judisch.Alexander Pruss & Richard M. Gale - 2003 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 53 (2):65-72.
On a recent argument for the impossibility of a statistical explanation of single events, and a defence of a modified form of Hempel's theory of statistical explanation.Colin Howson - 1988 - Erkenntnis 29 (1):113 - 124.
Review of Timothy O'Connor, Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency. [REVIEW]Graham Oppy - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (6).
Arguments from Design.Richard Swinburne - 2002 - Think 1 (1):49 - 54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
256 (#79,138)

6 months
8 (#361,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander Miller
New York University

Citations of this work

Acceptance-dependence: A social kind of response-dependence.Frank A. Hindriks - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):481–498.
Pragmatism, Truth and Response-Dependence.Andrew Howat - 2005 - Facta Philosophica 7 (2):231-253.
The case against evaluative realism.Dan López de Sa - 2006 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 21 (3):277-294.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references