Angelaki 24 (4):52-69 (2019)

Self-serving hegemonic visions of history are institutionalized by dominant memory entrepreneurs, simultaneously imposing an authoritative version of “what happened” and their right to articulate it. These visions and the hierarchies of honour they consecrate are cultivated trans-generationally, aiming to ensure the community’s political cohesion, as well as the emotional attachments that can ensure its reproduction over time. This paper has three objectives. First, it brings insights from social epistemology to bear on a conceptualization of political memory-making and proposes the concepts of “hermeneutical dissidence” and “hermeneutical seduction” to capture the critical interrogation of such mythologies. It highlights the obstacles facing any attempt at subverting them, particularly given the resilience of cognitive and emotional investments in particular schemas of perception and understanding in relation to the boundaries of the community and its history. Second, I transplant the descriptive concept of “affair” formulated by pragmatic sociologists into debates about political memory, infusing it with a dose of normativity in order to shed critical light on various types of hermeneutical dissidence from dominant, emotionally anchored, exclusionary imaginaries. Third, to render the theoretical proposal concrete, I introduce two “memory affairs,” both triggered by debates over the meaning and gender of political resistance.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0969725x.2019.1635825
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,172
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Caring Refusenik: A Portrait.Mihaela Mihai - forthcoming - Constellations.
Denouncing Historical “Misfortunes”.Mihaela Mihai - 2014 - Political Theory 42 (4):443-467.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Hermeneutical Sketch of Memory and the Immemorial.Jon Utoft Nielsen - 2011 - Continental Philosophy Review 44 (4):401-416.
Transformations Between History and Memory.Aleida Assmann - 2008 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 75:49-72.
Transformations Between History and Memory.Aleida Assmann - 2008 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 75 (1):49-72.
Memory: A History.Dmitriĭ Vladimirovich Nikulin (ed.) - 2015 - Oxford University Press USA.
On Diffident and Dissident Practices: A Picture of Romania at the End of the 19th Century.Roxana Patraș - 2015 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 2 (1):35-51.
Virgil's Eclogues and Social Memory.David Meban - 2010 - American Journal of Philology 131:99-130.
Virgil's Eclogues and Social Memory.David Meban - 2009 - American Journal of Philology 130 (1):99-130.
The Work of Memory: Time, Identity, and Justice.W. Booth - 2008 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 75:237-262.
Memory and Cognition.John Sutton, Celia B. Harris & Amanda Barnier - 2010 - In Susannah Radstone & Barry Schwarz (eds.), Memory: theories, histories, debates. New York: Fordham University Press. pp. 209-226.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,136,980 of 2,517,867 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,482 of 2,517,867 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes