Returning to Logica

In C. J. Mews (ed.), Abelard and Heloise. New York: Oxford University Press (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Returning to Logica. This chapter examines the Logica ‘Ingredientibus’, a series of commentaries on Porphyry, Aristotle, and Boethius more profound than any of his earlier glosses. I argue that in these commentaries Abelard adopts a much more profound theory of universals and of other parts of speech than in the Dialectica. Rather than emphasizing differences of opinion with William of Champeaux, they demonstrate how far Abelard had come to distance himself from the arguments of Boethius. Instead of speaking uniquely about dialectic, he is now interested in logica, the arts of language in general.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Early Years.Constant J. Mews - 2005 - In C. J. Mews (ed.), Abelard and Heloise. New York: Oxford University Press.
Challenging Tradition.Constant J. Mews - 2005 - In C. J. Mews (ed.), Abelard and Heloise. New York: Oxford University Press.
Abelard and Heloise.C. J. Mews - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Scritti di logica. [REVIEW]M. P. L. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 24 (4):739-740.
Heloise and Discussion about Love.Constant J. Mews - 2005 - In C. J. Mews (ed.), Abelard and Heloise. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references