Abstract

The question is raised whether the methods of psychology are adequate to provide an account of human behavior in terms meaningful for human existence. Also, The relationship between psychological theory and the evidence upon which it rests is discussed. "correlationism" and "constructuralism" are presented as two opposite orientations to theory in psychology. The author questions whether experience should be accepted as legitimate evidence and concludes that there should be acceptability of inner experience as legitimate scientific evidence in its own right. The author thinks the methodologies of operation-Ism and behaviorism to be limited. The scientific method, As used on the person and their experience, Must remain at the descriptive level for some time to come. (staff)