The uses and abuses of the history of topos theory

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (3):351-375 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The view that toposes originated as generalized set theory is a figment of set theoretically educated common sense. This false history obstructs understanding of category theory and especially of categorical foundations for mathematics. Problems in geometry, topology, and related algebra led to categories and toposes. Elementary toposes arose when Lawvere's interest in the foundations of physics and Tierney's in the foundations of topology led both to study Grothendieck's foundations for algebraic geometry. I end with remarks on a categorical view of the history of set theory, including a false history plausible from that point of view that would make it helpful to introduce toposes as a generalization from set theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
392 (#53,731)

6 months
30 (#108,680)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Colin McLarty
Case Western Reserve University

References found in this work

Philosophy of logic.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1970 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Edited by Simon Blackburn & Keith Simmons.
Philosophy of Logic.W. V. Quine - 2005-01-01 - In José Medina & David Wood (eds.), Truth. Blackwell.
Philosophy of Logic.Michael Jubien & W. V. Quine - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (1):303.
Introduction to Higher Order Categorical Logic.J. Lambek & P. J. Scott - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (3):1113-1114.

View all 26 references / Add more references