Non-strictly positive fixed points for classical natural deduction

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 133 (1):205-230 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Termination for classical natural deduction is difficult in the presence of commuting/permutative conversions for disjunction. An approach based on reducibility candidates is presented that uses non-strictly positive inductive definitions.It covers second-order universal quantification and also the extension of the logic with fixed points of non-strictly positive operators, which appears to be a new result.Finally, the relation to Parigot’s strictly positive inductive definition of his set of reducibility candidates and to his notion of generalized reducibility candidates is explained

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Free Semantics.Ross Thomas Brady - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (5):511 - 529.
Harmonising Natural Deduction.Hartley Slater - 2008 - Synthese 163 (2):187 - 198.
A Brief History of Natural Deduction.Francis Jeffry Pelletier - 1999 - History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (1):1-31.
Sequent calculus in natural deduction style.Sara Negri & Jan von Plato - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1803-1816.
Strictly positive measures on Boolean algebras.Mirna Džamonja & Grzegorz Plebanek - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (4):1416-1432.
A natural deduction system for first degree entailment.Allard M. Tamminga & Koji Tanaka - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (2):258-272.
The expressive power of fixed-point logic with counting.Martin Otto - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):147-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
17 (#867,741)

6 months
5 (#637,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?