Wittgenstein y Fodor sobre el lenguaje privado

Anuario Filosófico:357-376 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Whereas Wittgenstein rejected the existence of any private language, Fodor defends the existence of the language of thought, which is private in the sense of inner. A comparison is developed between Wittgenstein's and Fodor's ideas about this issue. Likewise a survey of Fodor's language of thought is made pointing out some shortcomings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Defence of Wittgenstein's Private Language Argument.Kichang Nam - 1993 - Dissertation, Michigan State University
Global aphasia and the language of thought.Fred Adams - 2020 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 35 (1):9-27.
Fodor: Language, Mind and Philosophy.Mark J. Cain - 2002 - Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Between Fodor and Darwin.Bence Nánay - 2021 - In Judit Gervain, Gergely Csibra & Kristóf Kovács (eds.), A Life in Cognition: Studies in Cognitive Science in Honor of Csaba Pléh. Springer Verlag. pp. 175-184.
The Language of Thought Thesis.Frank Macaluso - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Miami
Global Aphasia and the Language of Thought.Fred Adams - forthcoming - Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-07

Downloads
3 (#1,213,485)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pascual Martinez-Freire
University of Málaga

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references