- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Syntactic loss versus processing deficit: An assessment of two theories of agrammatism and syntactic comprehension deficits
Cognition 32 (2):157-191 (1989)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Agrammatism, syntactic theory, and the lexicon: Broca's area and the development of linguistic ability in the human brain.Claudio Luzzatti & Maria Teresa Guasti - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):41-42.
Comprehension deficits of broca's aphasics provide no evidence for traces.Paul Kay - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):37-38.
Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.David Caplan & Gloria S. Waters - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):77-94.
Evidence for Implicit Learning in Syntactic Comprehension.Alex B. Fine & T. Florian Jaeger - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (3):578-591.
Syntactic processing in agrammatism: A reply to Zurif and Grodzinsky.Marcia C. Linebarger, Myrna F. Schwartz & Eleanor M. Saffran - 1983 - Cognition 15 (1-3):215-225.
Unpruned trees in German broca's aphasia.Martina Penke - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):46-47.
Syntax in the brain: Linguistic versus neuroanatomical specificity.Angela D. Friederici & D. Yves von Cramon - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):32-33.
Syntactic representation in the lemma stratum.Holly P. Branigan & Martin J. Pickering - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):296-297.
Nonlinguistic transformation processing in agrammatic aphasia.Peter F. Dominey & Taïssia Lelekov - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):30-30.
Could grammatical encoding and grammatical decoding be subserved by the same processing module?Gerard Kempen - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):38-39.
In-line measures of syntactic processing using event-related brain potentials.Marta Kutas & Jonathan W. King - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):104-105.
What’s Right with a Syntactic Approach to Theories and Models?Sebastian Lutz - 2010 - Erkenntnis (S8):1-18.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
19 (#795,462)
6 months
11 (#232,787)
2014-01-20
Downloads
19 (#795,462)
6 months
11 (#232,787)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A computer model of the temporal course of agrammatic sentence understanding: The effects of variation in severity and sentence complexity.Henk J. Haarmann & Herman H. J. Kolk - 1991 - Cognitive Science 15 (1):49-87.
Comprehension of reversible sentences in “agrammatism”: a meta-analysis.Rita Sloan Berndt, Charlotte C. Mitchum & Anne N. Haendiges - 1996 - Cognition 58 (3):289-308.
When passives are easier than actives: two case studies of aphasic comprehension.Judit Druks & John C. Marshall - 1995 - Cognition 55 (3):311-331.
Could grammatical encoding and grammatical decoding be subserved by the same processing module?Gerard Kempen - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):38-39.
Processing distinctions between stems and affixes: Evidence from a non-fluent aphasic patient.Lorraine K. Tyler, Susan Behrens, Howard Cobb & William Marslen-Wilson - 1990 - Cognition 36 (2):129-153.
References found in this work
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis.Jerry A. Fodor & Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1988 - Cognition 28 (1-2):3-71.
Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics.Marcia C. Linebarger, Myrna F. Schwartz & Eleanor M. Saffran - 1983 - Cognition 13 (3):361-392.
On considerations of method and theory governing the use of clinical categories in neurolinguistics and cognitive neuropsychology: The case against agrammatism.William Badecker & Alfonso Caramazza - 1985 - Cognition 20 (2):97-125.
A final brief in the case against agrammatism: The role of theory in the selection of data.William Badecker & Alfonso Caramazza - 1986 - Cognition 24 (3):277-282.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-zf4z4 uwo