“Said and Done” Versus “Saying and Doing”: Gendering Practices, Practicing Gender at Work

Gender and Society 17 (3):342-366 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, the study of gender has focused on processes by which gender is brought into social relations through interaction. This article explores implications of a two-sided dynamic—gendering practices and practicing of gender—for understanding gendering processes in formal organizations. Using stories from interviews and participant observation in multinational corporations, the author explores the practicing of gender at work. She defines practicing gender as a moving phenomenon that is done quickly, directionally, and nonreflexively; is informed by liminal awareness; and is in concert with others. She notes how other conceptions of gender dynamics and practice inform the analysis and argues that adequate conceptualization of harmful aspects of gendering practices/practicing will require attention to agency, intentionality, awareness, and reflexivity; positions, power, and experience; and choice, accountability, and audience. She calls for incorporating the “sayings and doings” of gender into organization theory and research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond Binary Opposition: De-gendering And Redefining Gender.Ljiljana Markovic - 2003 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 10 (2):403-414.
Queering Heidegger: An Applied Ontology.E. Das Janssen - 2013 - Radical Philosophy Review 16 (3):747-762.
Undoing Gender.Francine M. Deutsch - 2007 - Gender and Society 21 (1):106-127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
22 (#705,671)

6 months
9 (#301,354)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?