Ought Implies Kant: A Reply to the Consequentialist Critique

Lexington Books (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Ought Implies Kant defends Kantianism via a critical examination of consequentialism. The latter is shown to be untenable on epistemic grounds; meanwhile, the charge that Kantianism is really consequentialism in disguise is refuted. The book also presents a novel interpretation of Kantianism as according direct duties owed to other animals.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,292

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kantianism and Mere Means.Christopher A. Brown - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (3):267-284.
Kant between the wars: A reply to Hohendahl.Andrew Chignell - 2010 - Philosophical Forum 41 (1-2):41-49.
Just consequentialism and computing.James H. Moor - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):61-65.
Consequentialize This.Campbell Brown - 2011 - Ethics 121 (4):749-771.
Kantian consequentialism.David Cummiskey - 1990 - Ethics 100 (3):586-615.


Added to PP

99 (#143,081)

6 months
1 (#510,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joel Marks
University of New Haven

Citations of this work

Kant's moral philosophy.Robert N. Johnson - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references