Dissertation, Uppsala University (2014)

Lavinia Marin
Delft University of Technology
The main research question that this paper aims to answer is: ‘In what does today’s attack on humanities consist and how can humanities be defended?’ In order to answer this research question, one needs first to describe how the humanities have argued for their usefulness before the Bologna Process; second, provide reasons for the claim that the Bologna Process would be a new type of attack; and third, analyse the new defences for the humanities, so as to discuss whether these are suitable. The main finding of this study was to show that, before deciding what type of education society needs, we need to understand who we are educating through our universities. Taking a stance on “who should we educate?” is prior to being able to judge educational policies. This decision requires a previous justification that requires arguments taken from the field of social justice: Who needs to be educated and who has the right to be educated? Furthermore, we have seen that all answers we have examined to the question underlying educational policies, i.e. ‘who is being educated?’, were linked at some level with the citizenship issue. By defining who is a full citizen, an answer to the question who had the right to a humanistic education was implicitly answered. Nussbaum’s project to universalise the definition of democratic citizenship would ensure a basis for providing humanistic education for all. Such a line of arguing would provide humanities to the well-regarded status they had starting from the Renaissance times, but this time not as a device for exclusion, but inclusion for all. We have tried to show that, by defending the humanities, one defends the idea of a plurality of educational purposes, the right to build one’s life based on an education that is not submitted to the political goals of the day, ultimately the right to have a dissenting voice and a different perspective on life. By defending humanities, one defends the true ‘usefulness’ of education, namely its potential for constructing democratic citizenship for all.
Keywords humanities  Bologna Process  European Higher Education Area  crisis  higher education
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Aristotle's Ethics.Richard Kraut - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Principle of Reason: The University in the Eyes of its Pupils.Jacques Derrida - 1983 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 10 (1):5-29.
Postmodernism.Gary Aylesworth - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Schiță pentru o posibilă filosofie a digitalului.Lavinia Marin - 2016 - Revista de Filosofie (Romania) 63 (5):571-582.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Digital Humanities as a Humanities Project.Patrik Svensson - 2012 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11 (1-2):425-60.
Academic Specialization and Contemporary University Humanities Centers.Martine Brownley - 2012 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11 (3):224-237.
What the Humanities Are For.Paul Cobley - 2014 - American Journal of Semiotics 30 (3):205-228.
The Humanities: Plain and Simple.Robert Garland - 2012 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11 (3):300-312.
Praxis and Pedagogy as Related to the Arts and Humanities.D. G. Mulcahy - 2010 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 9 (3):305-321.


Added to PP index

Total views
255 ( #42,151 of 2,498,789 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #40,994 of 2,498,789 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes