An Analysis of Probability Interpretations for the Physical and Biological Sciences

Dissertation, Washington University (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this work, five different interpretations of "probability" are analyzed: the classical, logical, subjective, relative frequency, and propensity interpretations. The objective is to determine which of these interpretations is most suitable for probability applications in the physical and biological sciences. The first state of this analysis involves evaluating the different interpretations with respect to the probability calculus. The objective at this point is not to reject any interpretations outright, but rather to keep in mind any difficulties in adherence to the calculus when evaluating these interpretations in later chapters. The second stage involves defending the need for an "objectivity criterion" and evaluating the various interpretations of "probability" with respect to this criterion. This "objectivity criterion" states that an adequate analysis of "probability" should result in probability statements that are true or false in virtue of the way the world is, independently of anyone's state of knowledge or beliefs about the probabilities in question. Based on this criterion, the classical, logical, and subjective interpretations are rejected. The third stage involves evaluating the relative frequency interpretation in greater detail. Both the actual relative frequency interpretation and the hypothetical relative frequency interpretation are evaluated. The actual relative frequency interpretation is found to be a promising candidate for providing an adequate analysis of "probability" for the physical and biological sciences. The fourth stage involves a detailed evaluation of the propensity interpretation. The propensity interpretation is shown to be in a weaker epistemological position than the relative frequency interpretation and to stem largely from misguided motivations concerning the importance of the single case in scientific applications and the nature of scientific explanation. Ultimately, it is concluded that the traditional actual relative frequency interpretation provides the best analysis of "probability" for applications in the physical and biological sciences

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A laplacean formal semantics for single-case propensities.Ronald N. Giere - 1976 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (3):321 - 353.
Objective Probabilities in Number Theory.J. Ellenberg & E. Sober - 2011 - Philosophia Mathematica 19 (3):308-322.
Probability and Relative Frequency.Michael Drieschner - 2016 - Foundations of Physics 46 (1):28-43.
Interpretations of Probability.Weimin Sun - 2003 - Dissertation, The University of Connecticut
A Third Way to Interpretations of Probability.Kyoung-Eun Yang - 2010 - Korean Journal of Logic 13 (1):53-81.
Probability.Henry E. Kyburg Jr - 1990 - In Henry Ely Kyburg (ed.), Science & reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
Probability, Indeterminism and Biological Processes.Charlotte Werndl - 2012 - In Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Stephan Hartmann, Michael Stöltzner & Marcel Weber (eds.), Probabilities, Laws, and Structures. Berlin: Springer. pp. 263-277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references