On the Mandatory Governance and Voluntary Governance Based on the Information Rights Allocation

Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:51-57 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Capital market investors the right to information is key to protecting the interests. Corporate governance in order to optimize the configuration right to information, improve efficiency of governance mechanisms to monitor budding style mandatory to voluntary self-governance to the innovation spiral path of evolution. Mandatory implementation of self-governance governance is a prerequisite, it can protect the interests of investors, maintain fair securities market; self governance is governance of listed companies to meet the mandatory requirements of the implementation of governance on the basis of innovation, it can maximize the value of the company, to improve stock market efficiency. Internal mechanism of self-governance and the external environment is to maintain the mandatory governance to build an important condition for the validity of the securities market. The information rights are the keys for protecting the investors' rights. The spiral path of evolution of corporate governance institution is from the spontaneity to mandatory governance and then to voluntary governance, according to optimizing the allocation of information rights, and improving the efficiency of governance . Mandatory governance is the premise of implementing voluntary governance, protecting investor rights, and safeguarding the securities market fair. Voluntary governance is the governance innovation based on meeting the requirement of mandatory governance, maximizing the firm value, improving the securities market efficiency

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Governance and social information disclosure evidence from the UK.Sepideh Parsa, Reza Kouhy & Christos Tzovas - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):205-222.
Securities market and corporate governance of privatised firms.Viet Ha Hoang - 2006 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):254-279.
Employee Governance and the Ownership of the Firm.John R. Boatright - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1):1-21.
Corporate governance models in emerging markets: The case of india.Silke Machold & Ajit Kumar Vasudevan - 2004 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (1):56-77.
Why are there Differences in Corporate Governance Among the Listed Companies?[author unknown] - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:34-44.
Ethics, Corporations, and Governance.Wesley Cragg & Dirk Matten - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):1-4.
Ethical issues in the evolution ofcorporate governance in china.OnKit Tam - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):303 - 320.
Corporate Governance in South Africa.G. J. Rossouw, A. Van der Watt & D. P. Malan - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):289 - 302.
Corporate governance and trust in business: A matter of balance.G. J. Rossouw - 2005 - African Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):1.
Are East Asian Companies Benefiting from Western Board Practices?John Nowland - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 79 (1-2):133 - 150.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references