Karl Jaspers’ Сritique of Existentialism. Philosophy of Existence and Existentialism

Filosofska Dumka (Philosophical Thought) 4:125-137 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a non-German-speaking environment is Jaspers sometimes mistakenly called as an existentialist. But Jaspers saw himself as a philosopher of existence, and he sharply criticized existentialism. This error arose because of confusion in the translations of the names Existenzphilosophie and Existentialismus from German into other languages. The difference between these terms was actively discussed immediately after Sartre’s lecture on humanism, in which Sartre, as he thought, announced a new direction in philosophy — existentialism (Existentialisme), to which he also included Jaspers as a religious member of this direction. The purpose of paper is to investigate and analyze Jaspers’ criticism of existentialism and his rejection of it. Because long before Sart re’s lecture, Jaspers wrote about the false philosophical method of the investigation of human being as opposed to the true way — the elucidation of existence (Existenzerhellung), and also noted that he created a new word to denote this false method — existentialism (Existentialismus). While Jaspers understood the elucidation of existence as self-reflection and self-experience, which deepen in the experiences of boundary situations (Grenzsituationen), he considers existentialism as the knowledge of human being as a certain object among other objects. Already later — after Sartre’s lecture — Jaspers began to criticize existentialism as a direction that arose under the influence of the philosophy of existence and as its decline. Jaspers connected existentialism mainly with Sartre and outlined the main grounds of his criticism: existentialism is based on bare abstraction and Sartre’s main slogan — existence (of personality) precedes essence — is an evidence of this; existentialism uses a certain poetic vagueness of some statements, and is an attempt to overcome nihilism through nihilism itself; this philosophy denies the existence of any transcendent basis of human and world. For these reasons, Jaspers rejected existentialism, which is fundamentally different from the philosophy of existence.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of existence.Karl Jaspers - 1971 - Philadelphia,: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Raison et existence chez Karl Jaspers.Jean Paumen - 1958 - Bruxelles]: Éditions du Parthénon.
Phenomenology and Existentialism.Merold Westphal - 2010 - In Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 167–175.
Karl Jaspers et la philosophie de l'existence.Mikel Dufrenne & Paul Ricœur - 1947 - Paris,: Éditions du Seuil. Edited by Paul Ricœur.
Jaspers and Sartre: transcendence and the difference of the divine.Deborah Casewell - 2023 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 32 (1):150-172.
Karl Jaspers werk und wirkung.Karl Jaspers & Klaus Piper (eds.) - 1963 - München,: R. Piper.
Selves and Personal Existence in the Existentialist Tradition.James O. Bennett - 1999 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (1):135-156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-25

Downloads
10 (#1,179,038)

6 months
10 (#257,636)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Die Geistige Situation der Zeit.Karl Jaspers - 1932 - Philosophical Review 41:540.
Von der Wahrheit.Karl Jaspers - 1952 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 142:136-138.
Das Geheimnis Kierkegaards.Erich Przywara - 1929 - Berlin,: De Gruyter.

View all 8 references / Add more references