Porphyry and Daniel 7: academic discussions between Maurice Casey and Arthur Ferch

Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 1:51-60 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The first Jewish interpretations, as well as the first Christian commentaries, on the Book of Daniel, are unanimous about an idea: that of the authority of the prophet Daniel. Porphyry from Tyre, being the first one to point out to the macabaic composition of the book and challenging the prestige of the figure of the prophet, questioned the foundations for which Christianity was justifying the legitimacy of its religious practices. By which ways has Porphyry prepared his arguments is the question that separates Casey and Ferch in different ways.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Porphyre sur la Providence.Michael Chase - 2015 - Chôra 13:125-147.
Porphyry’s Real Powers in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus.Irini-Fotini Viltanioti - 2017 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 11 (1):26-45.
‘Porphyry, An Anti-Christian Plotinian Platonist’.Yip-Mei Loh - 2017 - The International Academic Forum (IAFOR).
Porphyry's attempted demolition of Christian allegory.John Granger Cook - 2008 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (1):1-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-03

Downloads
1 (#1,889,095)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references