Women, Politics, and Reproduction: The Liberal Legacy

(1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Makus (political studies, Brock U.) examines the work of three political thinkers of the Western Tradition Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and John Stuart Mill to show that feminist interpretation of their writing is flawed in the belief that women are presented as naturally inferior to men in their capa.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Place of Women and Children in Liberal Doctrines.Ingrid Makus - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Feminist Interpretations of John Locke.Nancy J. Hirschmann & Kirstie Morna McClure (eds.) - 2007 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Essays on Sex Equality.John Stuart Mill & Harriet Taylor Mill (eds.) - 1970 - University of Chicago Press.
John Stuart Mill in love.Josephine Kamm - 1977 - London: Gordon & Cremonesi.
Mill: Texts, Commentaries.John Stuart Mill - 1997 - W W Norton & Company.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-03

Downloads
3 (#1,706,418)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Liberal feminism.Amy Baehr - 2012 - In Peter Adamson (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. pp. 150-166.
John Stuart mill, innate differences, and the regulation of reproduction.Diane B. Paul & Benjamin Day - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (2):222-231.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references