Why talk if we disagree?

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):1-12 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract According to a prevailing dogma of our time, real communication is practically impossible between those who have no common ?cultural language.? Karl Popper disputed this widespread opinion, arguing that, while it is tremendously difficult to communicate with a real (not artificially constructed) intellectual opponent, at the same time it is infinitely fruitful to do so. He also demonstrated how, while arguing ideologically, we improve both our own ideas and the collective knowledge of our society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why There Cannot be Any Such Thing as “Time Travel”.Rupert Read - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (2):138-153.
Flexible realism, flexibility, and holism.Russell Pryba - 2010 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):41-46.
The Talk I Was Supposed to Give….Achille C. Varzi - 2006 - In Andrea Bottani & Richard Davies (eds.), Modes of Existence: Papers in Ontology and Philosophical Logic. Ontos Verlag. pp. 131–152.
The irrelevance of the presentist/eternalist debate for the ontology of Minkowski spacetime.Mauro Dorato - 2006 - In Dennis Dieks (ed.), The ontology of spacetime. New York: Elsevier. pp. 93-109.
Real time II.David Hugh Mellor - 1998 - New York: Routledge.
What I Talk About When I Talk About Running; A Memoir.Jennifer Burr - 2010 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (3):361-364.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-18

Downloads
26 (#600,921)

6 months
6 (#510,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?