Patient Autonomy: How a Student’s Surgical Experience Highlights the Need for a New Standard Operating Procedure

Journal of Clinical Ethics 34 (3):285-287 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concerns regarding patient autonomy presented in August A. Culbert et al.’s “Navigating Informed Consent and Patient Safety in Surgery: Lessons for Medical Students and Junior Trainees” fall just short of addressing the main issue. Patient autonomy is not something that just one member of a team should consider, and it should not be something that any protocol should have the power to subvert, particularly in an environment as tenuous as the operating room. This article will take the concerns regarding the ethics of removing a patient’s hearing aid prior to entering the operating room presented in the aforementioned article and show the necessity for a new standard operating procedure.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The medical student and the suicidal patient.N. A. Barrett - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (5):277-281.
Informed Consent and Disclosure of Surgeon Experience.Sabha Ganai - 2019 - In Alberto R. Ferreres (ed.), Surgical Ethics: Principles and Practice. Springer Verlag. pp. 217-229.
The fivefold root of an ethics of surgery.Miles Little - 2002 - Bioethics 16 (3):183–201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-14

Downloads
14 (#990,773)

6 months
11 (#237,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references