Philosophy of Science 75 (4):447-457 (2008)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
There are two opposing traditions in contemporary quantum field theory (QFT). Mainstream Lagrangian QFT led to and supports the standard model of particle interactions. Algebraic QFT seeks to provide a rigorous consistent mathematical foundation for field theory, but cannot accommodate the local gauge interactions of the standard model. Interested philosophers face a choice. They can accept algebraic QFT on the grounds of mathematical consistency and general accord with the semantic conception of theory interpretation. This suggests a rejection of particle ontology. Or they can accept the standard model on the grounds of its established success. This alternative, which I defend, suggests revising philosophical accounts of scientific theory and finding some way of accommodating particles.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2008 |
DOI | 10.1086/595864 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics.Andrew Pickering - 1984 - University of Chicago Press.
In Defence of Naiveté: The Conceptual Status of Lagrangian Quantum Field Theory.David Wallace - 2006 - Synthese 151 (1):33-80.
No Place for Particles in Relativistic Quantum Theories?Hans Halvorson & Rob Clifton - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (1):1-28.
Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics.Andrew Pickering - 1990 - Synthese 82 (1):163-174.
View all 8 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Scientific Realism Made Effective.Porter Williams - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (1):209-237.
Quantum Field Theory: Underdetermination, Inconsistency, and Idealization.Doreen Fraser - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (4):536-567.
Particles, Cutoffs and Inequivalent Representations: Fraser and Wallace on Quantum Field Theory.Matthias Egg, Vincent Lam & Andrea Oldofredi - 2017 - Foundations of Physics 47 (3):453-466.
The dissipative approach to quantum field theory: conceptual foundations and ontological implications.Andrea Oldofredi & Hans Christian Öttinger - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-36.
Why Conceptual Rigour Matters to Philosophy: On the Ontological Significance of Algebraic Quantum Field Theory. [REVIEW]Meinard Kuhlmann - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1625-1637.
View all 11 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Objects or Events?: Towards an Ontology for Quantum Field Theory.Andreas Bartels - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):184.
Quantum Field Theory: Underdetermination, Inconsistency, and Idealization.Doreen Fraser - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (4):536-567.
Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory.N. Huggett - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):617-637.
Schwinger and the Ontology of Quantum Field Theory.Edward MacKinnon - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (4):295-323.
Complementarity Meets General Relativity: A Study in Ontological Commitments and Theory Unification.Alexander Rüger - 1989 - Synthese 79 (3):559 - 580.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
101 ( #117,230 of 2,518,720 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #137,692 of 2,518,720 )
2009-01-28
Total views
101 ( #117,230 of 2,518,720 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #137,692 of 2,518,720 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads