Araucaria as a Tool for Diagramming Arguments in Teaching and Studying Philosophy .

Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):111-124, (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explains how to use a new software tool for argument diagramming available free on the Internet, showing especially how it can be used in the classroom to enhance critical thinking in philosophy. The user loads a text file containing an argument into a box on the computer interface, and then creates an argument diagram by dragging lines from one node to another. A key feature is the support for argumentation schemes, common patterns of defeasible reasoning historically know as topics . Several examples are presented, as well as the results of an experiment in using the system with students in a university classroom

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
1,728 (#5,688)

6 months
170 (#18,228)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Giles Rowe
Open University (UK)
Douglas Walton
Last affiliation: University of Windsor
Fabrizio Macagno
Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa

References found in this work

Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning.Douglas N. Walton - 1996 - Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
The New Rhetoric.Charles Perelman & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1957 - Philosophy Today 1 (1):4-10.
Argument maps improve critical thinking.Charles Twardy - 2004 - Teaching Philosophy 27 (2):95--116.

View all 10 references / Add more references