Book review: Grażyna Anna Bednarek, Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse: Inquisitorial and Adversarial Procedures of Witness Examination in Criminal Trials [Book Review]

Discourse and Communication 10 (3):316-318 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/1750481316630891a

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Book review: Grażyna Anna Bednarek, Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse: Inquisitorial and Adversarial Procedures of Witness Examination in Criminal Trials. [REVIEW]Hanna H. Wei - 2016 - Discourse Studies 18 (3):362-364.
Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse: Inquisitorial and Adversarial Procedures of Witness Examination in Criminal Trials.[author unknown] - 2014
Reformulation and Conflict in the Witness Examination: The Case of Public Inquiries. [REVIEW]Silvia Cavalieri - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (2):209-221.
A Different Class of Witnesses: Experts in the Courtroom.Gail Stygall - 2001 - Discourse Studies 3 (3):327-349.
“Is it the case that …?”: Building toward findings of fact in Japanese criminal trials.Ikuko Nakane - 2017 - Semiotica 2017 (216):423-450.
How Many Interpreters Does It Take to Interpret the Testimony of an Expert Witness? A Case Study of Interpreter-Mediated Expert Witness Examination.Jieun Lee - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (1):189-208.
Fragmented Narratives and Multiple Tellers: Witness and Defendant Accounts in Trials.Sandra Harris - 2001 - Discourse Studies 3 (1):53-74.
Fair Trials and Procedural Tradition in Europe.Stewart Field - 2009 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2):365-387.
Book review: Monika Bednarek and Helen Caple, News Discourse. [REVIEW]Louann Haarman - 2014 - Discourse and Communication 8 (2):231-233.
Mysticism in the courtroom in 19th-century Europe.Andrea Graus - 2018 - History of the Human Sciences 31 (3):21-40.
Book review: Monika Bednarek and Helen Caple, News Discourse. [REVIEW]Paolo Nino Valdez - 2014 - Discourse Studies 16 (2):317-318.
Book Review: Monika Bednarek and J.R. Martin (eds), New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. [REVIEW]Jun Zhao - 2012 - Discourse Studies 14 (1):133-134.
Book review: Monika Bednarek, evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum, 2006, 253 pp. [REVIEW]Tatjana Radanović Felberg - 2008 - Discourse Studies 10 (6):817-819.
Book review: Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek and Fabio Rossi (eds), Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. [REVIEW]Haipeng Hu - 2013 - Discourse Studies 15 (4):491-493.
Courtroom setups in China's criminal trials.Ying-Long Zheng - 2014 - Semiotica 2014 (201):299-322.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
4 (#1,617,429)

6 months
1 (#1,470,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Logic and Conversation.H. P. Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: pp. 64-75.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.

Add more references