Compulsory Licensing in Canada and Thailand: Comparing Regimes to Ensure Legitimate Use of the WTO Rules

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (2):222-239 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The tension between economic policy and health policy is a longstanding dilemma, but one that was brought to the fore with the World Trade Organization’s Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement in 1994. The pharmaceutical industry has long argued that intellectual property protection is vital for innovation. At the same time, there are those who counter that strong IPP negatively impacts the affordability and availability of essential medicines in developing countries. However, actors on both sides of the debate were in agreement that something needed to be done to address the HIV/AIDS crisis, especially in developing countries. In response to sustained and significant pressure from civil society groups, members of the World Trade Organization agreed to the Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health in 2001. The Declaration clarified that countries unable to manufacture the needed pharmaceuticals could obtain more affordable generics elsewhere if necessary.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-24

Downloads
19 (#825,863)

6 months
6 (#587,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Pharmaceutical Innovation: Law & the Public's Health.Kevin Outterson - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (2):173-175.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references