Lucas against Mechanism: a Rejoinder

Etica E Politica 5 (1):1 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Coder’s argument is very similar to Lewis’ one: he maintains that some human beings are not able to follow Gödel’s theorem, so Lucas’ argument cannot show that their minds are not machines. The answer of Lucas is that one proposed against Lewis’ criticism, that is that Mechanism makes a universal claim and so a single counter-example – a single mind producing a singe truth not recognizable by any machine – is a disproof for it

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Godel's theorem and mechanism.David Coder - 1969 - Philosophy 44 (September):234-7.
Lucas against mechanism II.David Lewis - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (June):373-6.
Lucas against mechanism.David Lewis - 1969 - Philosophy 44 (June):231-3.
Minds, machines and Godel: A reply to mr Lucas.C. Whitely - 1962 - Philosophy 37 (January):61-62.
Mechanism: A rejoinder.John R. Lucas - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (April):149-51.
Lucas against mechanism II: A rejoinder.John R. Lucas - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (June):189-91.
This Gödel is killing Me: a Rejoinder.John Lucas - 2003 - Etica E Politica 5 (1):1.
Minds, Machines and Gödel.J. R. Lucas - 1961 - Etica E Politica 5 (1):1.
R. Lucas, Kurt Godel, and Fred astaire.David L. Boyer - 1983 - Philosophical Quarterly 33 (April):147-59.
Minds, Machines, and Gödel: A Retrospect.J. R. Lucas - 1996 - In Raffaela Giovagnoli (ed.), Etica E Politica. Clarendon Press. pp. 1.
The mind's I has two eyes.J. Martin & K. Engleman - 1990 - Philosophy 65 (264):510-515.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references