Kirk Lougheed
University of Pretoria
In a recent article, Ireneusz Zieminski argues that the main goals of philosophy of religion are to define religion; assess the truth value of religion and; assess the rationality of a religious way of life. Zieminski shows that each of these goals are difficult, if not impossible, to achieve. Hence, philosophy of religion leads to scepticism. He concludes that the conceptual tools philosophers of religion employ are best suited to study specific religious traditions, rather than religion more broadly construed. But it’s unclear whether the goals Zieminski attributes to philosophy of religion are accurate or even necessary for successful inquiry. I argue that an essentialist definition of religion isn’t necessary for philosophy of religion and that philosophers of religion already use the conceptual analysis in the way Zieminski suggests that they should. Finally, the epistemic standard Zieminski has in view is often obscure. And when it is clear, it is unrealistically high. Contemporary philosophers of religion rarely, if ever, claim to be offering certainty, or even evidence as strong as that found in the empirical sciences.
Keywords Zieminski  metaphilosophy of religion  scepticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.24204/ejpr.v11i1.2682
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of Religion as Way to Skepticism.Ireneusz Ziemiński - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (1):53-65.
The Problem of God’s Existence: In Defence of Skepticism.Ireneusz Ziemiński - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (1):143--163.
Logos czasu.Ireneusz Ziemiński - 2003 - Sztuka I Filozofia (Art and Philosophy) 22.
Orfeusz i Alkestis. Dwa sposoby usprawiedliwienia śmierci.Ireneusz Ziemiński - 2001 - Sztuka I Filozofia (Art and Philosophy) 20.
Pochwała filozofii.Ireneusz Ziemiński - 2014 - Filo-Sofija 14 (26):207-216.
O konieczności śmierci.Ireneusz Ziemiński - 2007 - Filo-Sofija 7 (1(7)):15-26.
Logos czasu.Ireneusz Ziemiński - 2003 - Sztuka I Filozofia 22:254.
Możliwość filozofii śmierci.Ireneusz Ziemiński - 2002 - Filo-Sofija 2 (1(2)):23-36.


Added to PP index

Total views
73 ( #150,621 of 2,461,470 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #52,831 of 2,461,470 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes