Should Detection Avoidance Be Criminalized?

Criminal Law and Philosophy 18 (2):431-449 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Human nature being what it is, individuals engaging in unlawful activity will often seek to avoid having their misconduct detected by law enforcement. This article provides the first legal analysis of what are termed detection avoidance measures, and evaluates whether, and how, they should be subject to criminalization.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Omissions Aren’t Special.Kate Greasley - forthcoming - Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-14.
On the ‘Specialness’ of the Criminal Law.Matt Matravers - 2023 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 17 (1):49-59.
Is Criminal Law ‘Exceptional’?R. A. Duff & S. E. Marshall - 2023 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 17 (1):39-48.
The Remains of Exceptionalism in Criminal Law.Francesco Viganò - 2023 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 17 (1):71-81.
Editorial.Michelle Madden Dempsey & Matt Matravers - 2023 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 17 (1):1-1.
Responses and Appreciations.Michael S. Moore - 2024 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 18 (1):217-252.
The Structure of Criminal Law.Re’em Segev - 2024 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 18 (2):497-517.
Reclamation: A Liberal Theory of Criminal Justice.Lindsey Jo Schwartz - 2023 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 17 (1):247-248.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-11

Downloads
2 (#1,818,851)

6 months
1 (#1,516,021)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references