The myth of ASCOT and its rival ASCO2.T: Tech-noetic vs. techno-logic, round 1

Technoetic Arts 9 (2-3):89-96 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The following article is a report on inevitable intervention in the current state of affairs in well-intended and well-funded projects based on obsolete categorization of art and science. After unsatisfactory outcomes, on the disappointment of project directors themselves, a productive collaboration between artists and scientists is still desperately sought after, without considering with subtlety a re-categorization that is already happening. This intervention is an ‘in advance reminder’ for foreseeable recognition of the current state of affairs, a reminder of the sensibility necessary to recognize, as soon as possible, the accelerating rate at which concepts are continuously becoming obsolete, and the increasing fluidity of our intellectual and intuitive production.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The High Impact of Low Tech in Social Work.Torben Elgaard Jensen - 2001 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 3 (1):81-87.
Reformed and evolutionary epistemology and the noetic effects of sin.Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):49-66.
Hedging and rounding in numerical expressions.Sandra Williams & Richard Power - 2013 - Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (1):193-223.
Plenary echnoethics: Art, Technology and Consciousness.Roy Ascot - 2002 - Art Inquiry. Recherches Sur les Arts 4:7-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
24 (#651,718)

6 months
4 (#779,649)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references