Limit ultrapowers and abstract logics

Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (2):437-454 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We associate with any abstract logic L a family F(L) consisting, intuitively, of the limit ultrapowers which are complete extensions in the sense of L. For every countably generated [ω, ω]-compact logic L, our main applications are: (i) Elementary classes of L can be characterized in terms of $\equiv_L$ only. (ii) If U and B are countable models of a countable superstable theory without the finite cover property, then $\mathfrak{U} \equiv_L \mathfrak{B}$ . (iii) There exists the "largest" logic M such that complete extensions in the sense of M and L are the same; moreover M is still [ω,ω]-compact and satisfies an interpolation property stronger than unrelativized ▵-closure. (iv) If L = L ωω(Q α ) , then $\operatorname{cf}(\omega_\alpha) > \omega$ and $\lambda^\omega for all $\lambda . We also prove that no proper extension of L ωω generated by monadic quantifiers is compact. This strengthens a theorem of Makowsky and Shelah. We solve a problem of Makowsky concerning L κλ -compact cardinals. We partially solve a problem of Makowsky and Shelah concerning the union of compact logics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#433,096)

6 months
14 (#200,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A note on extensions of infinitary logic.Saharon Shelah & Jouko Väänänen - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (1):63-69.
Ultrafilter translations.Paolo Lipparini - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (2):63-87.
More on regular and decomposable ultrafilters in ZFC.Paolo Lipparini - 2010 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (4):340-374.

Add more citations