Decision making in three modes

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 24 (1):47–65 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents an integrative framework for analyzing decisions. Three generic modes of decision making are identified: consequential choice , matching and reassessment . The three generic modes are compared on a common set of attributes, and the conditions for their proper use are outlined. Two case analyses illustrate how the framework can be used to analyze specific decisions from multiple perspectives

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-5914.1994.tb00246.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Rational decision making: balancing RUN and JUMP modes of analysis.Tilmann Betsch & Carsten Held - 2012 - Mind and Society 11 (1):69-80.
Multiple-Stage Decision-Making: The Effect of Planning Horizon Length on Dynamic Consistency.Joseph G. Johnson & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):217-246.
How we decide shapes what we choose: decision modes track consumer decisions that help decarbonize electricity generation.Crystal Reeck, Karoline Gamma & Elke U. Weber - 2022 - Theory and Decision 92 (3):731-758.
'How do I choose thee? Let me count the ways': A textual analysis of similarities and differences in modes of decision-making in china and the united states.Elke U. Weber, Daniel Ames & Ann-Renee Blais - manuscript
Rational decision making as performative praxis: Explaining rationality’s éternel retour.Laure Cabantous & Jean-Pascal Gond - 2011 - Organization Science 22 (3):573-586.
Towards a taxonomy of modes of moral decision-making.Elke U. Weber & Jessica S. Ancker - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):563-564.
Interactive Decision-Making and Morality.Wojciech Załuski - 2011 - In Colin Aitken, Amalia Amaya, Kevin D. Ashley, Carla Bagnoli, Giorgio Bongiovanni, Bartosz Brożek, Cristiano Castelfranchi, Samuele Chilovi, Marcello Di Bello, Jaap Hage, Kenneth Einar Himma, Lewis A. Kornhauser, Emiliano Lorini, Fabrizio Macagno, Andrei Marmor, J. J. Moreso, Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Burkhard Schafer, Chiara Valentini, Bart Verheij, Douglas Walton & Wojciech Załuski (eds.), Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag. pp. 413-444.
An ethical framework in information systems decision making using normative theories of business ethics.Utpal Bose - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):17-26.
Interpreting the Rules of the Game.C. Mantzavinos - 2007 - In Christoph Engel Firtz Strack (ed.), The Impact of Court Procedure on the Psychology of Judicial Decision-Making. Nomos. pp. 16-30.
Strategy, law, and ethics for business decisions.Christine Ladwig - 2020 - St. Paul, MN: LEG, Inc. d/b/a West Academic Publishing. Edited by George J. Siedel.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#115,291)

6 months
8 (#1,326,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):331-340.

View all 7 references / Add more references