The Divided Rhetoric of Sentimentality: Critique and Self-Definition in Wagner, Nietzsche, and Schnitzler

Dissertation, Princeton University (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation situates the writings of Richard Wagner, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Arthur Schnitzler in critical discussions on sentimentality. It identifies the critique of the sentimental as a rhetorical means of rejecting works of art beginning in the mid-nineteenth century, and it examines the ways in which each of these writers constructs sentimentality and manipulates the critique of it in order to prove himself a culturally viable creative subject. ;Chapter one identifies Wagner as a foremost representative who establishes sentimentality as a problematic aesthetic and attempts to exclude it from the German cultural tradition. Wagner uses sentimentality, freighted with connotations of emotional falsity and transgressive power, to construct a "Jewish aesthetic" in order to expel Jewish composers from the German musical tradition. Furthermore, Wagner exploits it as a screen for a projected body of aesthetic problems, with which he tries to negotiate the various contradictions in his then fledgling thoughts on music. ;Chapter two considers the way Nietzsche complicates the idea of defining sentimentality. He invokes two figures, "ressentiment" and "Wagner," which reveal performatively the significance of "sentimentality." Nietzsche rejects a formulation of self-identity through the construction and rejection of a sentimental other. Instead, he demonstrates that sentimentality is itself a figure for the manipulation of discursive space. ;Chapter three examines the representation and critique of sentimentality in a novel by Schnitzler. Sentimentality is problematized through Schnitzler's depictions of its debilitating effects such as subjective rootlessness and inaction. Schnitzler tries to insert his voice in the very critical discourse initiated and designed to exclude a Jewish voice such as his by redefining sentimentality as an illness commonly shared by modern subjects as a whole. ;The critical texts selected for analysis in this dissertation are culled from several disciplines in order to recall the pervasiveness of the critique of sentimentality. A close reading of works by Wagner, Nietzsche, and Schnitzler unravels the urgency with which these writers forge aesthetic self-definition against the unstable backdrop of modernity. It also contributes to our understanding of what we, late twentieth-century readers of culture, still reject under the name of sentimentality

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Problem With Sentimental Art.Nada Gatalo - 2008 - Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 5 (2):20-31.
The Sentimental Self.Joseph Kupfer - 1996 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):543 - 560.
In Defense of Sentimentality.Robert C. Solomon - 1990 - Philosophy and Literature 14 (2):304-323.
Social robots, fiction, and sentimentality.Raffaele Rodogno - 2016 - Ethics and Information Technology 18 (4):257-268.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references