The Burkean Entelechy and the Apocalypse of John

Dissertation, Purdue University (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purposes of the present study were two-fold: to provide an explanation of Kenneth Burke's theory of entelechy, and extract from his theory an entelechial critical methodology, and, to apply the Burkean methodology extracted to the Apocalypse of John. ;Burke claims that his theory of entelechy is an extension of Aristotle's theory of entelechy. In the present study, Burke's claim is corroborated. Burke extends Aristotle's primarily biological theory into the realm of symbolic action. In doing so, Burke makes mutatis mutandis adjustments to the Aristotelian theory in the areas of "form" and "material," as he replaces the Aristotelian concept of "causes" with "motives." Burke's methodology is presented as a tracking down of the perfectionist implications of terminologies, symbol systems. ;In applying the Burkean methodology extracted to the Apocalypse of John, the "representative anecdote" of the Apocalypse is identified as Woman vs. the Dragon . The Apocalypse is then entelechially critiqued from four perspectives--Poetics, Psychological, Socio-Political, and Rhetorical. ;From the Poetics perspective, the Apocalypse is seen as the ultimate human drama in which John chiastically/symmetrically perfects the future by developing a mirror-image of the past. John's structure is found to resemble the "Weltwochenschema" of the Rabbinic school of Elias as they both resemble a Greek trilogy-turned-tetralogy. ;From the Psychological perspective, the Apocalypse is seen as borrowing the archetypal "seven" form from the Creation Week account of Genesis 1. The expectations of this form are utilized by John as he emphasizes the entelechial "brink" number throughout the Apocalypse, the number "six." ;From the Socio-Political perspective, the Apocalypse is seen as perfecting an intra-Jewish political order. The top echelon of the Jewish hierarchy prior to 70 CE, the high priestly party, is "dramatistically replaced." ;From the Rhetorical perspective, John is seen as transcending the "Conqueror - Conquered" dichotomy by making the Conquered the Conqueror

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Apocalypse of John as Oral Enactment.David L. Barr - 1986 - Interpretation 40 (3):243-256.
Une Solution pour l’Argument de l’Apocalypse.Paul Franceschi - 1998 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):227 - 246.
Arguing the apocalypse: A theory of millenial rhetoric.John F. Laffey - 1996 - History of European Ideas 22 (2):125-126.
Kenneth Burke's Comedy of Motives.Angelo Anthony Bonadonna - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago
Images of Apocalypse in the Black Novel. May - 1970 - Renascence 23 (1):31-45.
Conditional Futurism: New Perspective of End-Time Prophecy.James Goetz - 2012 - Resource Publications, an imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references