A comparison of the legitimacy of power between confucianist and legalist philosophies

Asian Philosophy 10 (1):49 – 59 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of legitimacy is at the heart of the theory of power. It is essential to understand how a political power is built and how obedience is obtained among the population. We examine here the legitimacy of power for two of the most important political philosophies of classical China: Confucianism and Legalism. We show how a specific group of the population, the scholar-officials, play a specialised role in the two systems, acting as a legitimisation group. We further compare rites and laws as a way to obtain social order, and morality vs punishments as a way to obtain obedience. We conclude that the Confucianist system is less fragile than the Legalist, but also more oppressive, since it allows fewer personal choices to individuals.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
21 (#737,450)

6 months
1 (#1,471,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Han feizi's legalism versus kautilya's arthashastra.Roger Boesche - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (2):157 – 172.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references