Molecular-biological machines: a defense

Biology and Philosophy 38 (5):1-19 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I offer a defense, albeit a qualified one, of machine analogies in biology, focusing on molecular contexts. The defense is rooted in my prior work (Levy in Philosopher’s Imprint 14(6), 2014), which construes the machine machine-likeness of a system as a matter of the extent to which it exhibits an internal division of labor. A concrete aim is to shore up the notion of molecular biological machines, paying special attention to processive molecular motors, such as Kinesin. But I will also try to show how the division of labor account gives us guidance more broadly, both about where and why machine analogies can be expected to prove helpful and about their limitations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biological Machines: A Qualified Defense.Arnon Levy - forthcoming - Biology and Philosophy.
Who’s Afraid of Gory Details?Sun Kyeong Yu - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 43:215-223.
Synthetic biology and its alternatives. Descartes, Kant and the idea of engineering biological machines.Werner Kogge & Michael Richter - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (2):181-189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-11

Downloads
30 (#132,620)

6 months
18 (#821,922)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arnon Levy
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references