Authors
Mary Leng
University of York
Abstract
What should a Quinean naturalist say about moral and mathematical truth? If Quine’s naturalism is understood as the view that we should look to natural science as the ultimate ‘arbiter of truth’, this leads rather quickly to what Huw Price has called ‘placement problems’ of placing moral and mathematical truth in an empirical scientific world-view. Against this understanding of the demands of naturalism, I argue that a proper understanding of the reasons Quine gives for privileging ‘natural science’ as authoritative when it comes to questions of truth and existence also apply to other stable and considered elements of our inherited world-view, including, arguably, our firmly held mathematical and moral beliefs. If so, then the ‘thin’ mathematical and moral realisms of Penelope Maddy and T. M. Scanlon, respectively, are vindicated. We do not need to shoehorn mathematical and moral truths into the pushings and pullings of our empirical scientific world-view; for the busy sailor adrift on Neurath’s boat, mathematical and moral truths already have their place.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1093/arisoc/aow014
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,464
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Being Realistic About Reasons.T. M. Scanlon - 2014 - Oxford University Press.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Ethics–Mathematics Analogy.Justin Clarke-Doane - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (1).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Naturalism?David Copp - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):179-200.
Proof, Practice, and Progress.Mary Catherine Leng - 2002 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
A Indispensabilidade da Matemática na Ciência Natural.Eduardo Castro - 2011 - Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa.
Intuition in Moral Theory.Thomas Kent Appleberry - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Los cuatro tipos de verdad científica.Julián Garrido Garrido - 1992 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 7 (1-3):1183-1197.
Mathematical, Astrological, and Theological Naturalism.J. M. Dieterle - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (2):129-135.
Moral Particularism and Scientific Practice.Brendan Larvor - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):492-507.
What Are Mathematical Coincidences ?M. Lange - 2010 - Mind 119 (474):307-340.
Naturalism and Ontology.Penelope Maddy - 1995 - Philosophia Mathematica 3 (3):248-270.
Yes to Realism! No to Nonnaturalism! Ulysses - 2009 - Kritike 3 (1):168-177.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-09-15

Total views
35 ( #327,654 of 2,520,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #116,935 of 2,520,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes